Find the word definition

Crossword clues for statist

The Collaborative International Dictionary
Statist

Statist \Sta"tist\ (-t[i^]st), n. [From State.]

  1. A statesman; a politician; one skilled in government.

    Statists indeed, And lovers of their country.
    --Milton.

  2. A statistician.
    --Fawcett.

Douglas Harper's Etymology Dictionary
statist

1580s, "statesman;" 1803, "statistician;" 1976 as "supporter of statism;" 1960 as an adjective in this sense; from state (n.2) + -ist.

Wiktionary
statist

a. Pertaining to statism. n. 1 (context archaic English) A skilled politician or one with political power, knowledge or influence. (from 16th c.) 2 (context dated English) A statistician. (from 19th c.) 3 A supporter of statism. (from 20th c.)

Wikipedia
Statist (disambiguation)

Statist may refer to:

  • Anything pertaining to the political ideology of Statism
  • Statists (Belgium), a conservative political faction during the Brabant Revolution
  • The Statist, a British magazine which closed in 1967

Usage examples of "statist".

Nevertheless, the imperialists or the statists insisted on their false charge against the Pope, that he labored to found a purely theocratic or clerocratic government, and finding themselves unable to place the representative of the civil society on the same level with the representative of the spiritual, or to emancipate the state from the law of God while they conceded the divine origin or right of government, they sought to effect its independence by asserting for it only a natural or purely human origin.

American policies, from their cowboyish adventures in imperialism to their wasteful and destructive energy and environmental policies to—most damning—their insistence on an outdated economic system that had the infuriating habit of making her own preferred statist system seem inefficient.

Only businessmen—the producers, the providers, the supporters, the Atlases who carry our whole economy on their shoulders—are regarded as guilty by nature and are required to prove their innocence, without any definable criteria of innocence or proof, and are left at the mercy of the whim, the favor, or the malice of any publicity-seeking politician, any scheming statist, any envious mediocrity who might chance to work his way into a bureaucratic job and who feels a yen to do some trust-busting.

Without drafted armies, the foreign policies of statist or mixed economies would not be possible.

During the nineteenth century, it was free trade that liberated the world, undercutting and wrecking the remnants of feudalism and the statist tyranny of absolute monarchies.

The basic principle and the ultimate results of all statist doctrines are the same: dictatorship and destruction.

Tl belief is contradicted by the most fundamental facts a principles of economics—facts and principles which are s] tematically evaded by labor leaders, legislators, and intelle tuals of the statist persuasion.

It is this superlatively moral system that the welfare statists propose to improve upon by means of preventive law, snooping bureaucrats, and the chronic goad of fear.

If a determined, disciplined gang of statists were to make an assault on the crumbling remnants of a mixed economy, boldly and explicitly proclaiming the collectivist tenets which the country had accepted by tacit default—what resistance would they encounter?

We still run scared of actually cooperating in our own mutual interests, of being caught again in the Statist trap.

There were contradictions in the Constitution, which allowed the statists to gain an entering wedge, to enlarge the breach, and, gradually, to wreck the structure.

Freedom—cried statists of every breed anc sect—had had its chance and had failed.

But the welfare statists were quick to recognize that if they wished to retain political power, the amount of taxation had to be limited and they had to resort to programs of massive deficit spending, i.

The statists often use this period as example of "the unplanned chaos" of free enterprise.

And if government controls fail even with the first, what depth of evasion permits modern statists to hope that they can succeed with the second?