Find the word definition

The Collaborative International Dictionary
intercontinental ballistic missile

Missile \Mis"sile\, n. [L. missile.]

  1. A weapon thrown or projected or intended to be projected, as a lance, an arrow, or a bullet.

  2. A rocket-propelled device designed to fly through the air and deliver a warhead of explosive materials to a target.

    Note: Numerous types of rocket-propelled missile[2] are now used in modern warfare. Some types with names indicating their range or function are: antiaircraft missile; ballistic missile; cruise missile; antiballistic missile missile; air-to-air missile; air-to-ground missile; guided missile; intercontinental ballistic missile (IBM); intermediate range ballistic missile (IRBM); surface-to-air missile.

intercontinental ballistic missile

ballistic missile \bal*lis"tic mis`sile\, n. A rocket-propelled missile of long range which is guided only during the powered portion of its flight, which usually takes only a small part of the total flight time; -- contrasted with guided missile.

Note: Ballistic missiles are sometimes referred to by their range, such as an

intercontinental ballistic missile ( ICBM) or an

intermediate range ballistic missile ( IRBM).

Wiktionary
intercontinental ballistic missile

n. A class of long-range missiles associated especially with carrying nuclear warheads. Abbreviation: ICBM

WordNet
intercontinental ballistic missile

n. a ballistic missile that is capable of traveling from one continent to another [syn: ICBM]

Wikipedia
Intercontinental ballistic missile

An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is a guided ballistic missile with a minimum range of primarily designed for nuclear weapons delivery (delivering one or more thermonuclear warheads). Similarly, conventional, chemical, and biological weapons can also be delivered with varying effectiveness, but have never been deployed on ICBMs. Most modern designs support multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), allowing a single missile to carry several warheads, each of which can strike a different target.

Early ICBMs had limited precision ( circular error probable) that allowed them to be used only against the largest targets such as cities. They were seen as a "safe" basing option, one that would keep the deterrent force close to home where it would be difficult to attack. Attacks against (especially hardened) military targets, if desired, still demanded the use of a more precise manned bomber. This is due to the inverse-square law, which predicts that the amount of energy dispersed from a single point release of energy (such as a thermonuclear blast) dissipates by the inverse of the square of the distance from the single point of release. The result is that the power of a nuclear explosion to rupture hardened structures is greatly decreased by the distance from the impact point of the nuclear weapon. So a near-direct hit is generally necessary, as only diminishing returns are gained by increasing bomb yield.

Second- and third-generation designs (e.g. the LGM-118 Peacekeeper) dramatically improved accuracy to the point where even the smallest point targets can be successfully attacked.

ICBMs are differentiated by having greater range and speed than other ballistic missiles: intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs), and short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs). Such shorter-range ballistic missiles are known collectively as theatre ballistic missiles.

Usage examples of "intercontinental ballistic missile".

You've got a daughter in the University of California in Santa Barbara, right next to one of the biggest intercontinental ballistic missile bases in the world, the Vanderberry Air Force Base, a number one target for a hydrogen bomb.

I believe that if the B-1 mission has failed-and it has-the next step is either a cruise missile attack from long range, a naval strike force, or an intercontinental ballistic missile attack on Kavaznya.

Electronic signatures intercepted from Russian instruments being prepared to measure the rocket's telemetry gave one of the first clues that the missile was a Topol-M single-warhead intercontinental ballistic missile.

Now I was far more terrified by a warp missile than any intercontinental ballistic missile.

From a purely strategic standpoint, the fact that the Soviets had the rocket power to launch Sputnik 1 meant that they now also had the capacity to deliver the bomb on an intercontinental ballistic missile.

This was a full-blown intercontinental ballistic missile, capable of hitting Washington, New York, or any point in North America or Europe.

If Al-Abeid could do that, it could also be an intercontinental ballistic missile.

The Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1, exploded their first thermonuclear weapon, and successfully tested the first intercontinental ballistic missile (almost a year ahead of the United States).

How would we justify the most recent destabilizing developments of killer-satellites, particle beam weapons, lasers, neutron bombs, cruise missiles, and the proposed conversion of areas the size of modest countries to the enterprise of hiding each intercontinental ballistic missile among hundreds of decoys?