Find the word definition

Crossword clues for princes

Wiktionary
princes

n. (plural of prince English)

Wikipedia
Princes (novel)

Princes is a novel written by the award-winning Australian novelist Sonya Hartnett. It was first published in 1997 in Australia by Viking. It is a novel that isn't completely horror, but not for the weak-hearted as it has chapters about horror stories, death, poisoning, rats, dissecting, murder, imprisonment in your own house by your twin, swearing, illness and many other subjects that would make certain people squirm. It is a young adult book. Princes is a strange book, that explores the reason for hatred, psychological differences and seeing the inside of people, not out.

Category:1997 novels Category:Novels by Sonya Hartnett Category:Viking Press books

Princes (disambiguation)

Princes is the plural for prince, a royal title.

Princes may also refer to:

Roads:

  • Princes Highway, a major road in Australia
  • Princes Motorway, New South Wales, Australia
  • Princes Freeway, Victoria, Australia
  • Princes Street, a major thoroughfare in central Edinburgh, Scotland
  • Princes Street, Dunedin, New Zealand

Other uses:

  • Princes Group, a food manufacturing company based in the United Kingdom
  • Princes Bridge (disambiguation)
  • Princes Dock, part of the Port of Liverpool, England
  • Princes Park, Liverpool, a municipal park
  • Princes Ice Hockey Club, an early European ice hockey teams, sometimes considered the first ice hockey club in Britain
  • Prince Alfred College, a private boys school in Kent Town, South Australia, also known as Princes
  • Princes (novel) (1997), by Australian novelist Sonya Hartnett

Usage examples of "princes".

Artful men, who study the passions of princes, and conceal their own, approached his person in the disguise of philosophic sanctity, and acquired riches and honors by affecting to despise them.

And many whispered among themselves that it was a most ordinary affair, that princes marry all kinds of women, and even take gypsy women from their camps.

Censure, which arraigns the public actions and the private motives of princes, has ascribed to envy, a conduct which might be attributed to the prudence and moderation of Hadrian.

Many dependent princes and communities, dispersed round the frontiers, were permitted, for a while, to hold their freedom and security by the tenure of military service.

In this place we may observe, that the northern shores of the Euxine, beyond Trebizond in Asia, and beyond the Danube in Europe, acknowledged the sovereignty of the emperors, and received at their hands either tributary princes or Roman garrisons.

Within less than a century, the irresistible Zingis, and the Mogul princes of his race, spread their cruel devastations and transient empire from the Sea of China, to the confines of Egypt and Germany.

Yet the wisest princes, who adopted the maxims of Augustus, guarded with the strictest care the dignity of the Roman name, and diffused the freedom of the city with a prudent liberality.

Those princes, whom the ostentation of gratitude or generosity permitted for a while to hold a precarious sceptre, were dismissed from their thrones, as soon as they had performed their appointed task of fashioning to the yoke the vanquished nations.

In their pompous courts, those princes united the elegance of Athens with the luxury of the East, and the example of the court was imitated, at an humble distance, by the higher ranks of their subjects.

When Pompey commanded in the East, he rewarded his soldiers and allies, dethroned princes, divided kingdoms, founded colonies, and distributed the treasures of Mithridates.

Augustus, and maintained by those princes who understood their own interest and that of the people, it may be defined an absolute monarchy disguised by the forms of a commonwealth.

Such princes deserved the honor of restoring the republic, had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom.

Suspicious princes often promote the last of mankind, from a vain persuasion, that those who have no dependence, except on their favor, will have no attachment, except to the person of their benefactor.

Had it indeed been possible to realize this dream of fancy, such princes as Trajan and the Antonines would surely have embraced with ardor the glorious opportunity of conferring so signal an obligation on mankind.

Yet, even in the East, the sphere of contention is usually limited to the princes of the reigning house, and as soon as the more fortunate competitor has removed his brethren by the sword and the bowstring, he no longer entertains any jealousy of his meaner subjects.